Publications
PB Legal | Panin, Bayramkulov & Partners - recommended company for wealthy clients according to Forbes.
Forbes Club presents the first research of the best law companies in Russia, practicing in the protection of wealthy clients’ interests.
PB Legal | Panin, Bayramkulov & Partners - recommended company for wealthy clients according to Forbes.
Forbes Club presents the first research of the best law companies in Russia, practicing in the protection of wealthy clients’ interests.
PB Legal is recommended in the next categories:
- Dispute Resolution;
- International Project Management (including disputes).
Great pre-New Year news!
#TEAMIlya Kozhinov, Associate of PB Legal | Panin, Bayramkulov & Partners, and Rafael Nugmanov, Paralegal of PB Legal, have taken part in compiling the Arbitration Association’s Review of Russian Court Practice on Arbitration and Cross-Border Litigation for 1H 2021.
The Review is notable for containing a number of precedent positions on arbitration and cross-border litigation issues.
The Review comprises four main sections summarising the judicial acts of Russian courts on the following topics:
- General issues of international arbitration and arbitral proceedings;
- Recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards;
- Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgements;
- Application of foreign law by Russian courts.
To read the Review please follow this link
#TEAMWe are happy to share great news with you! PB Legal | Panin, Bayramkulov & Partners was recognized in the Pravo-300 rating in two categories at once:
Group III - Arbitration Litigation (major disputes - high-market).
Group III - International Litigation
Pravo.ru Rating is the leading rating of law firms in the Russian market.
We are happy to share great news with you! PB Legal | Panin, Bayramkulov & Partners was recognized in the Pravo-300 rating in two categories at once:
Group III - Arbitration Litigation (major disputes - high-market). Group III - International Litigation
Pravo.ru Rating is the leading rating of law firms in the Russian market. We are glad that we have once again managed to get into several categories, which are our main specialization.
Congratulations to our colleagues!
#TEAMProjects
An appeal in the interests of a creditor (a significant construction company) against a judgment on a claim by an affiliated person against a bankrupt.
Our client is a major construction company that is a creditor in the bankruptcy case of a manufacturing company. In bankruptcy proceedings, the debtor's subsidiary filed claims for more than RUB 700 million.
An action for invalidity of transactions was brought by a minority shareholder of a subsidiary company on its behalf.
Our client is a major construction company that is a creditor in the bankruptcy case of a manufacturing company. In bankruptcy proceedings, the debtor's subsidiary filed claims for more than RUB 700 million.
An action for invalidity of transactions was brought by a minority shareholder of a subsidiary company on its behalf. The plaintiff claimed that the chain of commerce was a cover for another trade that had been made without the necessary corporate approval and was aimed at withdrawal of the company's assets. In court, the debtor agreed with the plaintiff's position, as a result of which the transactions were declared invalid.
The client, as a creditor of the debtor, appealed a judgment declaring the transactions invalid. As part of the case, we analyzed the corporate and commercial relationships between the debtor, its subsidiary, the plaintiff, and other members of their class. As a result of a detailed analysis, we developed a legal opinion that disclosed the nature of the transactions between the class members. The pattern we identified led us to conclude that the funds transferred under the contested transactions remained under the control of the debtor's subsidiary and that the transactions caused it no harm. We also revealed that the contested transactions were aimed at including a creditor "friendly" to the debtor in the bankruptcy case. In addition, we substantiated in detail that the plaintiff had missed the statute of limitations.
Conducting an internal investigation at a major pork producer company in Russia in connection with an outbreak of African swine fever.
Our client is an agro-industrial company in the Tver region, one of Russia's 20 largest pork producers.
The PB Legal team conducted an internal corporate investigation into the legality of the actions of government agencies and company employees during the outbreak of viral animal disease.
Our client is an agro-industrial company in the Tver region, one of Russia's 20 largest pork producers.
The PB Legal team conducted an internal corporate investigation into the legality of the actions of government agencies and company employees during the outbreak of viral animal disease.
Preparation of a legal opinion on the assessment of risks in the application of the creditor’s claims in the debtor’s bankruptcy case.
Our client is a large company established on the initiative of the President of the Russian Federation, which is engaged in the development of investment projects in the regions of the Russian Federation. As a result of the revision of the case under newly discovered circumstances, the client had claims against the debtor.
Our client is a large company established on the initiative of the President of the Russian Federation, which is engaged in the development of investment projects in the regions of the Russian Federation. As a result of the revision of the case under newly discovered circumstances, the client had claims against the debtor.
The PB Legal team prepared a legal opinion assessing the client's risks related to the application claims in the debtor's bankruptcy case, as well as the prospects of satisfying the said claims. The legal opinion also analyzed the procedure for reversing a judgment in a situation where a debtor is declared bankrupt. Based on the results of the analysis, the client was given recommendations in connection with the statement of claims in the debtor's bankruptcy case.